a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT by FORCE (local to national) that is needing to be
countered, resisted, undermined, eliminated.
Render unto Cheney the things that are Cheney’s and Unto GOD the things that are Gods’.
197 other "American" Corporate Military Bases around the planet.
Don’t water-board me, Bro!
Since when? Since the revolt against the British FAILED.
They thought they were ‘free’, but the Queen and her Bankers had their hooks into the ‘new republic’ from day one…
ALL of the TREASURY is GONE.
They refuse to account for TRILLIONS, enough to pay off all of every Americans’ debts.
Yet "they" have the audacity to ACT OUT their criminal intent now in the open.
WE also CONDEMN the FOOLS in that AZ State Patrol car that rolled into an RV campground
today at 4 pm-onto private property without a warrant. One scream by the lady they were harrassing/visiting
would have brought their careers to an abrupt end, for many neighbors were watching, guns in hand, for this is, after all, TOMBSTONE. This is where we have told Border Patrol they are cowards and traitors for failing to take simple possession of the border, and we tell them in NO UNCERTAIN WORDS, ‘don’t go staging a gunfight (with smugglers) here, or the neighbors are bound not to have it, and will return fire on both your asses, bringing an end to such foolhardiness and taking risks in our backyards instead of doing duty on the Border.
In other words, THERE IS NO TRUST OF AUTHORITIES,
only rational fear.
It would appear the TIPPING-POINT has been reached.
7PM MST We predict the next headline will be only 3 letters, and it will be a DOMESTIC story:
W A R
– Infowars – http://www.infowars.com –
It’s Getting Very Serious Now
Posted By admin On May 12, 2009 @ 3:50 pm In Featured Stories | 312 Comments
May 12, 2009
First, it was a Missouri Analysis and Information Center (MIAC)
report; then it was a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report; now
it is a New York congressman’s bill. Each of these items, taken on
their own, is problematic enough; taken together they portend “a clear
and present danger” to the liberties of the American people. It is
getting very serious now.
|If one doubts the intention of
the elitists in government today to deny the American people their
right to keep and bear arms, consider what former Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger is purported to have said just a couple of weeks ago.
As readers may recall, the MIAC report profiled certain people as
being potential violence-prone “militia members”: including people who
supported Presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and myself. In
addition, anyone who opposed one or more of the following were also
included in the list: the New World Order, the U.N., gun control, the
violation of Posse Comitatus, the Federal Reserve, the Income Tax, the
Ammunition Accountability Act, a possible Constitutional Convention,
the North American Union, the Universal Service Program, Radio
Frequency Identification (RFID), abortion on demand, or illegal
The MIAC report prompted a firestorm of protest, and was eventually
rescinded, with the man responsible for its distribution being
dismissed from his position. The DHS report profiled many of the same
people included in the MIAC report, and added returning Iraq and
Afghanistan war veterans as potentially dangerous “extremists.”
As I have said before, it is very likely that when all of the
opinions and views of the above lists are counted, 75% or more of the
American people would be included. Yet, these government reports would
have law enforcement personnel to believe we are all dangerous
extremists that need to be watched and guarded against. If this was not
bad enough, a New York congressman has introduced a bill in the House
of Representatives to deny Second Amendment rights to everyone listed
According to World Net Daily, May 9, 2009, “A new gun law being
considered in Congress, if aligned with Department of Homeland Security
memos labeling everyday Americans a potential ‘threats,’ could
potentially deny firearms to pro-lifers, gun-rights advocates, tax
protesters, animal rights activists, and a host of others–any already
on the expansive DHS watch list for potential ‘extremism.’
“Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., has sponsored H.R. 2159, the Denying
Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009, which
permits the attorney general to deny transfer of a firearm to any
‘known or suspected dangerous terrorist.’ The bill requires only that
the potential firearm transferee is ‘appropriately suspected’ of
preparing for a terrorist act and that the attorney general ‘has a
reasonable belief’ that the gun might be used in connection with
“Gun rights advocates, however, object to the bill’s language,
arguing that it enables the federal government to suspend a person’s
Second Amendment rights without any trial or legal proof and only upon
suspicion of being ‘dangerous.’”
WND quotes Gun Owners of America Executive Director Larry Pratt as
saying, “By [DHS] standards, I’m one of [DHS Secretary] Janet
Napolitano’s terrorists. This bill would enable the attorney general to
put all of the people who voted against Obama on no-gun lists, because
according to the DHS, they’re all potential terrorists. Actually, we
could rename this bill the Janet Napolitano Frenzied Fantasy
Implementation Act of 2009.”
Pratt was also quoted as saying, “Unbeknownst to us, some bureaucrat
in the bowels of democracy can put your name on a list, and your Second
Amendment rights are toast.” He went on to say, “This such an
anti-American bill, this is something King George III would have done.”
Now that DHS has established both a list and a lexicon for
“extremists,” it looks to Congress to confer upon it police-state-style
powers through which these individuals may be disarmed and eventually
done away with. Rep. Peter King is accommodating this goal with H.R.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
me ask a reasonable question: how long does anyone think it would be,
after being profiled by DHS and denied the lawful purchase of firearms,
that those same people would be subjected to gun confiscation? And how
long do you think it would be before DHS began profiling more and more
groups of people, thus subjecting them to gun confiscation?
This was exactly the strategy employed by Adolf Hitler. The Jews
were the first people denied their civil rights–especially the right to
own and possess firearms. Of course, after disarming Jews, the rest of
the German citizenry was likewise disarmed. And we all know where that
I’m not sure how many of the American people realize that it was the
attempted confiscation of the colonialists’ cache of arms in Concord,
Massachusetts, that started America’s War for Independence. Yes, my
friends, it was attempted gun confiscation that triggered (pun
intended) the “shot heard ’round the world.” And now it would appear
that, once again, a central government is on the verge of trying to
deny the American people their right to keep and bear arms.
I am told that as of 2004, 50% of the adults in the United States
own one or more firearms, totaling some 270 million privately owned
firearms nationwide. I would venture to say that the vast majority of
these gun owners would find themselves matching the DHS profile of a
potential “extremist.” I wonder how many gun owners realize the way
they are now being targeted by their government, and just how
serious–and how close–the threat of gun confiscation has become?
If one doubts the intention of the elitists in government today to
deny the American people their right to keep and bear arms, consider
what former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger is purported to have
said just a couple of weeks ago. Kissinger attended a high-level
meeting with Russian President Medvedev that also included former
Secretaries of State James Baker and George Shultz; former Secretary of
Defense William Perry; and former Senator Sam Nunn. Included in the
discussions was Kissinger’s assertion that the American people were now
ready to accept a “New Global Order.” He is also reported to have told
Medvedev, “By September we’ll have confiscated all privately owned guns
so it really doesn’t matter what we do, we’ll still be in charge.”
(Even though the national news media has not reported this statement,
the Internet is abuzz with Kissinger having said it. Whether Kissinger
actually made that statement or not, he, and rest of his ilk, have
repeatedly called for a New World Order, in which there will be no
constitutional protection for the right to keep and bear arms.)
This leads to a very serious question: how many of America’s gun
owners would allow their government to deny them gun ownership?
Further, how many would passively sit back and allow their guns to be
As humbly and meekly as I know how to say it: as for me and my
house, gun confiscation is the one act of tyranny that crosses the
line; debate, discourse, discussion, and peaceful dissent cease and
desist at that point. I say again, it is getting very serious now.
Article printed from Infowars: http://www.infowars.com
URL to article: http://www.infowars.com/its-getting-very-serious-now/
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2008 Infowars. All rights reserved.